What are you thankful for today?
Showing posts with label feminism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label feminism. Show all posts
Sunday, November 10, 2013
A Month of Gratitude, Day 10
It's no surprise to anyone who's read my blog for the past year that there are some things about my church that make me uncomfortable. I have been going through a faith transition of sorts lately, perhaps something that is long overdue, really, considering that I was born and raised Mormon and have never strayed from the church. Mormons are prone to saying "I know" when talking about their beliefs regarding the church, and for many years that has made me uncomfortable. There are not a lot of things that I can say I know for sure - I may believe them, but I don't know them - but the one things I feel I can say that I do know is that God loves me. And today I'm thankful for the faith I have that allows me to know that.
Thursday, April 11, 2013
An Open Letter to Those Who Do Not Understand Mormon Femnists
For many people, the phrase “Mormon feminist” is an
oxymoron. For others, it’s akin to
heresy. For me, it’s an identity. It’s part of who I am. Because so many people do not understand how
it is possible to be both, and because I have read so many blog posts and
Facebook comments recently expressing disdain and distaste for women who
identify as Mormon feminists, I would like to explain what it means to me to be
one.
First of all, let me say that my testimony of the Gospel of
Jesus Christ is not based on whether or not a woman prays in General
Conference, or on what I wear to church, or on whether I will ever see my
daughters pass the Sacrament. Rather, my
testimony is based on my understanding of the teachings of Christ and on the
love I feel from Him in my life. There
are many things about which I feel comfortable saying “I believe”, but there
are not many things about which I feel comfortable saying “I know”. However, one thing I do know is that my
Savior loves me. I know He knows me
personally, and I know He sees not only who I am now, but who I want to
be. When I am at my lowest He is there
to lift me up and He gives me strength when I am weak. Because I know He loves me, I also know that
God loves me.
Many people who are opposed to feminism in the Church assume
that what feminists are seeking is equal power – that all we want is the
Priesthood. It is true that there are
women agitating for the opportunity to hold the Priesthood. But this is only a small part of what
feminists want, and it is not something that is wanted by all who identify as
feminists.
Instead, what feminists want are equal rights. We want to be acknowledged as important, and
not just for our ability to give birth and to nurture children. Yes, these are important qualities that women
possess, but not all women will become mothers.
What, then, is their role in the Church?
What of the women who do not wish to be placed on pedestals and told that
they are better than men, or more spiritual, or more righteous? These are tokens, and they feel like a condescending
pat on the head. I do not wish to be
better than any man, or any woman. I
only wish to be equal.
On April 6, a
woman made history in the Church, and all she did was offer a prayer. Of course, women pray all the time, even in
public. But this particular prayer
closed the first session of the 183rd annual General Conference of
the Church. And until that moment, no
woman had ever been invited to offer a prayer in a general session of General
Conference. Why not? No one really knows. There is no clear reason, except that women
had never prayed in Conference before.
Tradition. A group joined together
and wrote letters, requesting that a break in tradition be considered. Amid outcry from members who did not
understand why anyone cared, the letters were sent to Church headquarters in Salt
Lake City. According to the official
Church spokesman, the decision regarding who would pray was made months before
General Conference, so it seems likely that women (a woman prayed to open the
concluding session of Conference on April 7) were already slated to pray before
the letter-writing campaign even began.
However, I firmly believe that, regardless of when the decision was
made, God heard the prayers of the people advocating for change and He answered
them, in His own way and in His own time.
When Joseph Smith was a boy, God did not just appear to him
and tell him to start a new church. Even
though I’d like to think that this was in His plans all along, it wasn’t until Joseph
went to God in prayer and ASKED Him which church to join that God gave him the
answer that he should not join any, but that God had a work for him to do. In the scriptures we are told, over and over,
to ask for help. “If any of you lack wisdom,
let him ask of God, that giveth to all men liberally, and upbraideth not; and
it shall be given him.” -James 1:5. “And
all things, whatsoever ye shall ask in prayer, believing, ye shall receive.” -Matthew 21:22. “Ask, and it shall be given unto you; seek,
and ye shall find; knock, and it shall be opened unto you.” -3 Nephi 14:7. And over and over and over. God is pretty clear that He keeps the lines
of communication open. He welcomes our
questions, and we are told that He will answer us.
Why, then, if we believe these words so strongly, and if we believe
that God listened to the prayers of a 14-year-old farmboy, do we find it so
hard to believe that God will listen to and answer the prayers of hundreds of
women? President Gordon B. Hinckley, Prophet
and President of the Church from 1995-2008, was asked in an interview if he
thought women could ever be given the Priesthood in the Church, if the current
policies could ever change, and he answered, “Yes. But there’s no agitation for that.” That was in 1997, and perhaps there was no agitation
then, but now, in 2013, there is. I don’t
think it’s such a leap to believe that it’s possible that things could
change. Who are we to claim to know and
understand God’s plans?
I participated
in the now infamous “Wear Pants to Church Day”.
I did this for a variety of reasons, but mostly because I felt it was
important to stand up for those women who feel marginalized in the Church. And whether or not anyone else THINKS women
should feel that way does not change the fact that there are women who DO feel
that way. After Sacrament Meeting was
over that day, I had a woman give me a hug and thank me for wearing pants. I didn’t know before then that she felt that,
but she needed someone to wear pants for her, and I’m glad I followed my heart
and chose to do so.
It is wrong to tell others how to feel. We are human; we cannot always control our
emotions and our experiences. We all
come from different places in life, and things touch us in different ways. What feels right to me will not feel right to
everyone else. There are many Mormon women
who are perfectly comfortable with the way things are in the Church, and I
applaud and genuinely congratulate them.
But there are also many Mormon women who do not. For one reason or another, or for many
reasons put together, we do not feel represented, understood, heard, or
respected in the Church. This is certainly
not to say that we do not feel these things from God, but rather from the men
who run the Church here on earth. And
this is why we have chosen to speak up and speak out.
I do not know whether women will ever hold the Priesthood in
the LDS church. I don’t even know if
this matters to me or not – I haven’t figured that out yet. But what does matter to me is that women have
a place in the Church where they feel safe, loved, and understood. Where they feel represented and
respected. Where they can share in
worship and love without worrying that they will be turned away by other Church
members for questioning tradition. Because
if the Gospel of Jesus Christ is about love, then why are those of us who do
not fit into the traditional Mormon mold being shown so little love from our
fellow Church members?
Please show us, your sisters, some love and respect. Please make an effort to understand where we
are coming from. Please stop belittling
us for feeling the way we do, even if you do not understand how or why we could
feel that way. Please do not make it
harder for us to stay in the Church. The
Gospel of Jesus Christ is perfect, even if His followers are not. He welcomes our questions. All we can ask is that, as His people, you do
the same. We need your love; please don’t
turn us away.
Labels:
advocating,
faith,
feminism,
me
Sunday, December 16, 2012
Pants, part 2
I did it. I wore pants to church.
Between Wednesday morning, when I made the decision to participate in Wear Pants to Church Day, and today, I've had a lot of time to think about this event, and what it truly means to me.
I did not expect the backlash that swelled around this event. It seemed fairly innocuous to me, a great way to make a statement without really making a statement. As people have said over and over, on both sides of the argument, it's not about what we wear to church, it's about what's in our hearts. But for most Mormons, dressing up for church is a very important sign of respect for our Father in Heaven, and a way to separate Sunday, our Sabbath Day, from the rest of the week. And I completely agree with this.
But I also agree with the many Mormon women who feel that the scales are out of balance when it comes to men and women in the Church. I listed a few reasons for this in my original post on pants, but since I wrote that I found this excellent post, which lists more, many of which resonate with me. Knowing there are women who feel like they do not have a voice or a place in this church that they so fully believe strengthened my resolve to participate in the event, to wear pants to church today, not to protest the "dress code", but to show solidarity and support for women everywhere in the Church.
I've had one prayer in my heart constantly over the past several days: that the Lord would help me to have my heart in the right place today as I went to church in my gray slacks, and that he would help me to be able to touch at least one person in the way that they needed. I told Him that I didn't even need to know about it, but I asked Him to just let me be a light to someone today.
As far as I could tell, I was the only woman in pants in my ward today. Chris wore his new purple tie (purple being the color historically associated with the suffragette movement and the suggested way for men to participate), and Vicki wore her black gaucho-style pants, which she unashamedly wears to church on a regular basis (despite admitting to me that she has gotten some strange looks and a few questions). I know people noticed my pants as I walked in, but no one said anything, and I didn't feel any animosity. I often sing with the choir on short notice, and I was asked to join them today, but I respectfully declined because I didn't want to draw attention to myself when I'd already made it clear that I wouldn't be "parading my pants down the aisle" (although the reason I gave the choir director was that I didn't know the song, which is also true). It was a very pleasant meeting with two wonderful talks on keeping Christ in Christmas, and I felt comfortable (both spiritually and emotionally as well as physically) and content.
And after the meeting was over, as I was standing up ready to leave, a lady that I've always admired came up to me, gave me a hug, and said she agreed with everything I'd written on my blog and wanted to let me know that she'd have worn pants if she'd had any that were appropriate.
So today I'm thankful that I chose to wear my pants. I'm thankful for an answer to a prayer, for the opportunity to be a light, and for the strength to stand up for what I believe is good and right.
Between Wednesday morning, when I made the decision to participate in Wear Pants to Church Day, and today, I've had a lot of time to think about this event, and what it truly means to me.
I did not expect the backlash that swelled around this event. It seemed fairly innocuous to me, a great way to make a statement without really making a statement. As people have said over and over, on both sides of the argument, it's not about what we wear to church, it's about what's in our hearts. But for most Mormons, dressing up for church is a very important sign of respect for our Father in Heaven, and a way to separate Sunday, our Sabbath Day, from the rest of the week. And I completely agree with this.
But I also agree with the many Mormon women who feel that the scales are out of balance when it comes to men and women in the Church. I listed a few reasons for this in my original post on pants, but since I wrote that I found this excellent post, which lists more, many of which resonate with me. Knowing there are women who feel like they do not have a voice or a place in this church that they so fully believe strengthened my resolve to participate in the event, to wear pants to church today, not to protest the "dress code", but to show solidarity and support for women everywhere in the Church.
I've had one prayer in my heart constantly over the past several days: that the Lord would help me to have my heart in the right place today as I went to church in my gray slacks, and that he would help me to be able to touch at least one person in the way that they needed. I told Him that I didn't even need to know about it, but I asked Him to just let me be a light to someone today.
As far as I could tell, I was the only woman in pants in my ward today. Chris wore his new purple tie (purple being the color historically associated with the suffragette movement and the suggested way for men to participate), and Vicki wore her black gaucho-style pants, which she unashamedly wears to church on a regular basis (despite admitting to me that she has gotten some strange looks and a few questions). I know people noticed my pants as I walked in, but no one said anything, and I didn't feel any animosity. I often sing with the choir on short notice, and I was asked to join them today, but I respectfully declined because I didn't want to draw attention to myself when I'd already made it clear that I wouldn't be "parading my pants down the aisle" (although the reason I gave the choir director was that I didn't know the song, which is also true). It was a very pleasant meeting with two wonderful talks on keeping Christ in Christmas, and I felt comfortable (both spiritually and emotionally as well as physically) and content.
And after the meeting was over, as I was standing up ready to leave, a lady that I've always admired came up to me, gave me a hug, and said she agreed with everything I'd written on my blog and wanted to let me know that she'd have worn pants if she'd had any that were appropriate.
So today I'm thankful that I chose to wear my pants. I'm thankful for an answer to a prayer, for the opportunity to be a light, and for the strength to stand up for what I believe is good and right.
Labels:
advocating,
faith,
feminism,
me
Wednesday, December 12, 2012
Pants
The idea of
dressing up for worship is an old one, and a common one in most Christian
churches, though more and more churches these days have adopted a
come-as-you-are attitude that encourages people to come to church with a focus
on worship and not on the dress of those around them. I have no problem with this, because I’m most
comfortable in jeans and t-shirts every day of the week.
However, I
also really love the idea of dressing our best for the Lord. As someone who wears jeans and t-shirts every
day of the week, I enjoy making a distinction on the day that is set aside for
worship. Sunday is a special day,
separate from the rest of the week, and when I put on my “Sunday best”, it’s
helping me to make that distinction.
I own a very
nice pair of gray slacks. I bought them
years ago to wear to work, and I pull them out every once in a great while now
that I no longer have a job that requires business casual attire. I also own a denim skirt, which is very
clearly denim (in other words, not so dark it could be mistaken for navy
cotton). It is socially acceptable (within
the Church) for me to wear my denim skirt to church, but not my gray
slacks. Why is this? If we are supposed to wear our very best for
the Lord, why is it acceptable for me to wear something that would be rejected
at most jobs that require people to dress up (for example, can you imagine a female
senator or governor showing up for work in a denim skirt?), but it is not acceptable
for me to wear pants that are much more dressy?
A group of women have organized this Sunday, December 16, as “Wear Pants to Church Day”. They are encouraging women to take this tiny
baby step toward a little more equality in the Church and wear “...not jeans,
or sweats, or yoga pants, but dress pants. Tailored suits and flowing shalwars
and holiday-appropriate black velvet. Pants that are modest, elegant, and
feminine, and not at all out of place in a church house (not that we think you
need to be any of those things to worship God!).”
Their
purpose for this event? “…to give voice
to and express support for women who don’t conform to traditional gender roles
and those who seek gender equality in the LDS church.” There are those of us out there who, for
whatever reason, don’t fit in to the traditional gender roles defined by the
Church. Women who feel uncomfortable at
church. Some may still continue to attend,
some may not. Everyone has their
struggles, and until you’ve walked a mile in their shoes, it’s wrong to judge
them.
I guess now
is a good time for me to come out and say it: I am a feminist.
I’m also a
Mormon. It’s kind of an awkward place to
be.
Now, before
folks go getting all riled up, I’d like to address the term “feminist”. See, there are certain individuals out there
with a public presence who try to silence women, especially strong women, by distorting
the message of feminism, and calling us belittling names like “femi-nazi”. We are not demanding to be the same as
men. We are not trying to take rights
away from men, or to make the world entirely gender-neutral. I’m proud to be a woman and happy to be
different from men. What I’m hoping for,
and praying for, is the equality that should be extended to all of God’s
children, regardless of race, religion, or gender - the equality that is
lacking in so many places and points of view.
As Sandra Ford said in her recent
post on Feminist Mormon Housewives:
"We envision a world where we can participate fully in our religion, where we are afforded the same opportunities as our fathers, husbands, brothers, and sons: a place where programs for girls receive funding on par programs for boys; a place where young women are encouraged to serve missions on the same terms as young men; a place where women can finish their schooling without being criticized for putting off marriage and pursue careers without being condemned for abandoning the home; a place where mothers can bless their sick children and preside alongside their husbands in the home; a place where our spiritual progress is based on our worth as individuals, rather than on our relationships to the men around us."
I like being
a woman; I don’t want to be a man. I don’t
want to be better than the men around me.
I don’t want to have more than them, or be above them in any way. I simply want to be equal.
I consider
us a feminist family. Ask Chris; he’ll
say the same. (In fact, sometimes I
think he’s more of a feminist than I am.)
With three daughters, it’s important to both of us that they grow up to
be strong, independent women, that they are sure of themselves and comfortable with
who they are.
This is not
about the Priesthood. Over and over in the
Church, women are placed second to men. The
budget for youth programs for girls is much smaller than it is for boys (the Young
Men and Young Women programs generally have the same budget, but the Scouts
often have an additional, separate budget even though they fund the same boys; Cub
Scouts get a rather large portion of the Primary budget, but the Activity Days
girls don’t generally get a budget at all).
I was fortunate enough to grow up in a part of the world where the Boy
Scout program was not part of the youth program at church, so our activities
were pretty similar, but I dread the day when Vicki, who would spend all summer
at camp if we let her, realizes how many camping trips the boys take and how
much more money is spent on them compared to the girls. This is one reason why we will continue with
the Girl Scout program in addition to the Church programs, at least as long as our
girls want to. Women do not give the
prayers in General Conference, though two or three may speak over the course of
the four general sessions. The
Priesthood session takes place the same weekend as the general sessions, twice
a year, but the sessions that are specific to women take place the weekend
before, are referred to as “broadcasts” rather than “sessions”, and alternate
between the Relief Society in the fall and the Young Women in the spring. Women are not called to positions such as
Ward Clerk or Sunday School President, even though neither of those callings is
a Priesthood position.
The fact
that women do not hold the Priesthood in our church is not why I will be
wearing pants to church on Sunday.
Maybe women will hold the Priesthood one day, maybe they won’t. But I hope one day my daughters will be able
to walk into church in a nice pair of slacks, maybe chat with the people in the
next pew about the beautiful prayer Sister So-and-so gave last week in General
Conference, and then send their daughters off to Young Women, where they’ll
make plans for their next camping trip.
I believe in
a loving Savior who knows me as an individual and loves me for who I am and who
I want to become. He knows my strengths and my weaknesses, and,
most importantly, He knows my heart. His
Gospel is a gospel of love, of understanding, of forgiveness and mercy. When I show up in Church on Sunday in my gray
slacks, I believe He will understand why I am wearing them, and He will be
proud of me.
Labels:
advocating,
faith,
feminism,
me
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

